It is evident from the information provided that there are questionable interpretations of data related to the success and usage of social media platforms. The claims made by Elon Musk and his supporters regarding X being the number one news app and beating Meta’s apps in usage need to be critically examined. It is mentioned that X’s data is based on web traffic only, which accounts for a fraction of the platform’s user base. This data does not include app usage, which is significant as the majority of X users access the platform via mobile devices. Therefore, comparing web traffic data can be misleading and does not reflect the overall usage of X when compared to platforms like Facebook and Instagram.
Another point of contention is the categorization of X as a “News” app in the App Store. The decision to shift X into the “News” category was a strategic move to boost its growth narrative and capitalize on the perceived opportunity in that segment. However, it is highlighted that X is primarily a social media platform with user-generated content, making it ineligible to be classified as a news app on the Google Play Store. The continuous listing of X as the number one “News” app raises concerns about the accuracy and relevance of this categorization, especially when comparing it to smaller apps that have a fraction of its user base.
The information presented also sheds light on the stagnant growth of X in terms of daily active users and revenue. Despite claims of increased interest and engagement, the platform has not added any daily active users since November 2022. The reported increase in monthly active users does not paint a picture of significant growth, especially when considering the impact of removing bot accounts. Additionally, the decline in revenue compared to the previous year indicates that X is not performing as well as projected.
The article highlights the use of selective data and misleading narratives by Elon Musk and X supporters to showcase the platform’s success. By emphasizing specific metrics like daily user seconds and framing X as a leading news app, there is a deliberate attempt to project a positive image of the platform. However, a critical analysis reveals that these claims do not provide an accurate representation of X’s current status and performance in the social media space.
It is crucial to approach data and narratives about social media platforms with a critical eye. Misleading interpretations, questionable categorizations, and selective data presentation can distort the true picture of a platform’s success. It is essential to scrutinize and verify claims made by influential individuals and organizations to gain a more accurate understanding of the digital landscape.
Leave a Reply